Север и рынок. 2025, № 2.

СЕВЕР И РЫНОК: формирование экономического порядка. 2025. № 2. С. 7-21. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2025, no. 2, pp. 7-21. СТРАТЕГИЧЕСКОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕ РАЗВИТИЕМ РОССИЙСКОГО СЕВЕРА И АРКТИКИ 8. Blanutsa V. I. Prostranstvennoe razvitie Arkticheskoi zony Rossii: analiz dvukh strategii [Spatial development of the Russian Arctic Zone: Analysis of two strategies]. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 111-121. https://doi.org/10.25283/2223-4594-1-111-121. (In Russ.). 9. Volkov A. D., Roslyakova N. А., Kanevsky E. A., Boyarsky K. K. Arkticheskie strategii Rossii 2014 i 2021: vozmozhna li preemstvennost' pri smeshchenii prioritetov? Chast' 1 [Russia's Arctic strategies of 2014 and 2021: Is continuity possible amid shifting priorities? (Part 1)]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2025, no. 1, pp. 7-25. https://doi:10.37614/2220-802X.1.2025.87.001. 10. Howlett M., Rayner J. Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in 'New Governance Arrangements'. Policy and Society, 2007, no. 26, pp. 1-18. https://doi: 10.1016/S1449-4035(07) 70118-2. 11. Lenschow A., Bocquillom P., Carafa L. Understanding coherence between policy spheres. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2018, no. 28, pp. 323-328. https://doi:10.1002/eet.1818. 12. Marx K. Kapital. Kritika politicheskoi ekonomii. T 1, kn. 1. Protsessproizvodstva kapitala [Capital. A critique of political economy. Vol. 1, Book 1. The process of capitalist production]. Leningrad, Gospolitizdat, 1952, 794 p. (In Russ.). 13. Dewi D., Aytekin D., Schneider K. R., Covic N., Fanzo J., Nordhagen S., Resnick D. Defining and measuring policy coherence for food system transformation: A scoping review. Global Food Security, 2024, vol. 43, 100803. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.gfs.2024.100803. 14. Debbage N., Atasoy M., Mitra C., Byahut S. Urban climate action plans in the United States: A textual content analysis and evaluation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 106095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.106095. 15. Kruskal W. H., Wallis W. A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal o f the American Statistical Association, 1952, vol. 47, Issue 260, pp. 583-621. 16. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1945, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 80-83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968. 17. Esmonde K., Jones J., Johns M., Hutler B., Faden R., Barnhill A. "Lives versus livelihoods": Conflict and coherence between policy objectives in the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Science & Medicine, 2024, vol. 357, 117188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117188. 18. Kidd R., Reynolds C. Food policy coherence in local government: Who does what and why? Food Policy , 2024, vol. 129, 102740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102740. 19. Vidal-Hernandez L., Cuevas-Jimenez A., De Yta-Castillo D., Avila-Foucat V. S., Espejel I. Public policy instruments coherence analysis to address coastal risk in Yucatan, Mexico. Marine Policy , 2024, vol. 167, 106280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106280. 20. Albrecht E., Belinskij A., Heikkila E. Policy coherence for ecosystem-based management: Implementing EU water and marine policies in the Archipelago Sea. Marine Policy, 2025, vol. 171, 106427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106427. 21. Ancapi F. B., Van den Berghe K., Van Bueren E. Circular city policy coherence in Greater London. Cities, 2024, vol. 155, 105423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105423. 22. Blanutsa V. I. Geograficheskaya ekspertiza strategii regional'nogo tsifrovogo razvitiya: kontury formiruyushchikhsya podkhodov [Geographical expertise of regional digital development strategies: Contours of emerging approaches]. Geografiya i prirodnye resursy [Geography and Natural Resources], 2022, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 5-11. https://doi.org/10.15372/GIPR20220401. (In Russ.). 23. Surguladze V. Sh. Ideologicheskoe izmerenie Strategii natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii: sravnitel'nyi analiz dokumentov 2015 i 2021 godov [The ideological dimension of the national security strategy of the Russian Federation: A comparative analysis of the documents of 2015 and 2021]. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finasovogo universiteta [Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University], 2022, no. 12 (1), pp. 60-69. https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-1-60-69. (In Russ.). 24. Grimmer J., Stewart B. M. Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 2013, no. 21 (3), pp. 267-297. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028. 25. Baden C., Pipal C., Schoonvelde M., Van der Velden M. A. C. G. Three gaps in computational text analysis methods for social sciences: A research agenda. Communication Methods and Measures, 2021, no. 16 (1), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.2015574. 26. Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution . Klagenfurt, 2014, 143 p. Available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173. 27. Boyarsky K. K., Kanevsky E. A. Nelokal'nye semanticheskie svyazi v russkoyazychnykh tekstakh [Features of non-local semantic links in Russian texts]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskii vestnik informatsionnykh tekhnologii, mekhaniki i optiki [Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics], 2018, Vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 863-869. https://doi:10.17586/2226-1494-2018-18-5-863-869. (In Russ.). © Рослякова Н. А., Волков А. Д., Каневский Е. А., Боярский К. К., Козлова А. Д., 2025 20