Север и рынок. 2025, № 1.

СЕВЕР И РЫНОК: формирование экономического порядка. 2025. № 1. С. 7-25. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2025, no. 1, pp. 7-25. СТРАТЕГИЯ И МЕХАНИЗМЫ РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ В РОССИЙСКОЙ АРКТИКЕ 6. Volkov A. D., Tishkov S. V., Nikitina A. S. Evolyutsiya mekhanizmov upravleniya ekonomicheskim prostranstvom rossiyskoy Arktiki: sovremennyy etap [Evolution of Economic Management Mechanisms in the Russian Arctic: The Present Stage]. Ars Administrandi [Ars Administrandi], 2022, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 174-201. https://doi:10.17072/2218-9173-2022-2-174-201. (In Russ.). 7. Koshkin V. New developments in the regulations of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation: Continuity and change. The Polar Journal, 2020, Vol. 10, no 2, pp. 443-458. https://doi:10.1080/2154896X.2020.1848711. 8. Blanutsa V. I. Prostranstvennoe razvitie Arkticheskoi zony Rossii: analiz dvukh strategiy [Spatial development of the Russian Arctic Zone: Analysis of two strategies]. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2021, Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 111-121. https://doi: 10.25283/2223-4594-2021-1-111-121. (In Russ.). 9. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications, 2019, 472 p. https://doi:10.4135/9781071878781. 10. Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2016, no. 2, pp. 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001. 11. Lane R., Kronsell A., Reynolds D., Raven R., Lindsay J. Role of local governments and households in low-waste city transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2024, Vol. 52, 100879. https://doi:10.1016/j.eist.2024.100879. 12. Moser-Plautz B. Barriers to digital government and the COVID-19 crisis — A comparative study of federal government entities in the United States and Austria. International Review o f Administrative Sciences, 2024, Vol. 90, Issue 2, pp. 402-418. https://doi:10.1177/00208523231183566. 13. Ratanaburi N., Alade T., Sagli F. Effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of bicycle infrastructure. A case of Rattanakosin bicycle lane, Bangkok, Thailand. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2021, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 637-650. https://doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2021.03.002. 14. DePaula N., Dincelli E., Harrison T. M. Toward a typology of government social media communication: Democratic goals, symbolic acts and self-presentation. Government Information Quarterly , 2018, Vol. 35, Issue 1, pp. 98-108. https://doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.003. 15. Stone J. A., Hakan C. S. Factors influencing tweet purposes and citizen engagement with municipal Twitter accounts. Online Information Review, 2021, Vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 501-516. https://doi:10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0175. 16. Roengtam S., Nurmandi A., Almarez D. N., Kholid A. Does social media transform city government? A case study of three ASEAN cities: Bandung, Indonesia, Iligan, Philippines and Pukhet, Thailand. Transforming Government People Process and Policy, 2017, Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 343-376. https://doi:10.1108/TG-10-2016-0071. 17. Evans L., Franks P., Chen H. M. Voices in the Cloud: Social media and trust in Canadian and U. S. local governments. Records Management Journal, 2018, Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 18-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-11-2016-0041. 18. Rodrigues J. d. L., Gomes S. C., Borges F. Q. Electronic participation via Facebook: the potential from Brazilian municipalities. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2021, Vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 442-462. https://doi:10.1108/TG-06-2019-0049. 19. Stone J. A., Flanders K. J., Robles P., Can S. H. Strategic measurement and evaluation of municipal social media: insight from front-line personnel in the United States. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy , 2024, Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 103-117. https://doi:10.1108/TG-07-2023-0090. 20. Mergel I. A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 2013, Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015. 21. Purbokusumo Y., Santoso A. D. Predictor for local government social media use in Indonesia. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 2021, Vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 533-552. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-12-2018-0082. 22. DePaula N., Dincelli E. Information strategies and affective reactions: How citizens interact with government social media content. First Monday, 2018, Vol. 23, no. 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i4.8414. 23. Zhang Y., Chen L., Xie M. How do NPOs' topics and moral foundations in gun-related issues influence public engagement on Twitter? Internet Research, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-11-2022-0909. 24. Beelitz A., Merkl-Davies D. M. Discursive framing in private and public communication by pro-nuclear corporate, political and regulatory actors following the Fukushima disaster. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2019, Vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1585-1614. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2928. 25. Lapenkova N. V., Pobyvaev S. A., Zolotarev E. V. Aprobatsiya razrabotannoi metodiki komparativnogo analiza na primere zarubezhnykh i otechestvennykh dokumentov strategicheskogo planirovaniya v oblasti energeticheskoi bezopasnosti [Testing a methodology of comparative analysis on national and international strategic documents in the sphere of energy security]. Voprosy bezopasnosti [Security Issues], 2021, no. 4, pp. 11-29. https://doi:10.25136/2409-7543.2021.4.36382. (In Russ.). © Волков А. Д., Рослякова Н. А., Каневский Е. А., Боярский К. К., 2025 23